Template:Did you know nominations/Codex Monacensis (X 033)

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 12:13, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

Codex Monacensis (X 033)

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that a manuscript of the New Testament was bound with the books in the wrong order, to which a scholar decried "[he] has messed everything up"?

• Source:

• Reviewed:

Improved to Good Article status by Stephen Walch (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Stephen Walch (talk) 18:12, 2 November 2024 (UTC).

• Hi Stephen: this article, promoted to GA on November 1, is new enough, long enough, well-sourced, and presentable. No copyvio or close paraphrase. Hook sourced, short enough, and interesting. QPQ does not need to be done. Best, Tenpop421 (talk) 02:19, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
  • @Stephen Walch and Tenpop421: Would something closer to the article's text like below not be more clear. In the original hook "[he]" seems to refer to the scholar at first.
    • ALTX... that a manuscript of the New Testament was bound in the wrong order, to which a scholar decried "the bookbinder has messed everything up"?
  • Feel free to cross off the hook above if not interested, Rjjⁱⁱⁱ (talk) 02:41, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
    • @Rjjiii: That will suit me, Rjjⁱⁱⁱ. :) Stephen Walch (talk) 13:34, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

References