Template:Did you know nominations/Codakia orbicularis
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 16:34, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Codakia orbicularis, Ctena orbiculata, Lucina pensylvanica
( Back to T:TDYK )
( Article history links: )
- ... that the gill chambers of the tiger lucine, the dwarf tiger lucine and the Pennsylvania lucine contain symbiotic bacteria which help them to colonise sediments not suited to other organisms?
- ALT1:... that the gill chambers of the tiger lucine, the dwarf tiger lucine and the Pennsylvania lucine contain symbiotic bacteria able to oxidise sulphur?
- Reviewed: Troy, Montana
- Comment: Also reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Sunny Lam and Template:Did you know nominations/Taxodium dubium
5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 11:19, 29 December 2020 (UTC).
- Reviewing Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:37, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
I feel we are getting a little techical for a mainpage hook, is there a slightly better way to say "colonise sediments"? I think the rest is fine, the articles look good, QPQs done and it is a reasonably interesting hook, but might need a little dumbing down. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:40, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- ALT2 ... that the gill chambers of the tiger lucine, the dwarf tiger lucine and the Pennsylvania lucine contain symbiotic bacteria which help them to live in sediments not suited to other bivalves?
- ALT3 ... that the gill chambers of the tiger lucine, the dwarf tiger lucine and the Pennsylvania lucine contain symbiotic bacteria which help them to live in sulfide-rich sediments not suited to other bivalves?
- @Lee Vilenski: Thank you for the review. How about ALT2 or ALT3 then? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:50, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- If you don't mind linking bivalves then I'd be happy. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:53, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Lee Vilenski: There you are then. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:37, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 20:53, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Lee Vilenski: There you are then. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:37, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- If you don't mind linking bivalves then I'd be happy. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:53, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Lee Vilenski: Thank you for the review. How about ALT2 or ALT3 then? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:50, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
