Template:Did you know nominations/Cielo Veizaga
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Flibirigit (talk) 02:16, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Cielo Veizaga
- ... that the Bolivian footballer Cielo Veizaga became the youngest government official in the country's history when she was appointed vice minister of sports at just 19-years-old? Source: "Cielo Veizaga, a 19-year-old footballer, was appointed [...] as Bolivia's vice minister of sports [...]. There is no record of such a young person having previously held a position". La República
Created by Krisgabwoosh (talk). Self-nominated at 10:08, 17 January 2022 (UTC).
General eligibility:
- New enough:
- n - Long enough:
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing: - ?
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
QPQ: 
- Not done
Overall: 
Krisgabwoosh Article is new and long enough and about an interesting life and career, copyvio shows me a 0'00%. QPQ is missing though. And some phrases are unsourced; I sourced some of the text, but I guess you know better in what article to find the missing citations. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 17:02, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
- I'd like to review this one.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 15:04, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review! I'll get to submitting a QPQ shortly. In the meantime, could you direct me to the phrases you found to be unsourced? I'll see what I can do about finding adequate citations after that. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 23:35, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
- I'll add some invisible comments into the article.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 00:05, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
- Ah, ok. I've checked the comments and it appears that everything mentioned is properly sourced. Typically, if multiple sentences in a row use the same source, I find it adequate to place the citation at the end of the last sentence that uses it, rather that after each individual sentence. (E.g. "His name is John. He was born in Kansas. He worked as a consultant.[1]" rather than ""His name is John.[2] He was born in Kansas.[2] He worked as a consultant.[2]") Krisgabwoosh (talk) 00:42, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
- I'll add some invisible comments into the article.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 00:05, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review! I'll get to submitting a QPQ shortly. In the meantime, could you direct me to the phrases you found to be unsourced? I'll see what I can do about finding adequate citations after that. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 23:35, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
- New? Its a great article but is it less than a week old? Victuallers (talk) 11:38, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
- Already wanted to reply it was created yesterday but..., it was created last November 2021. Thanks for being so attentive. I guess this then makes it a no show.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 21:01, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
- That's unfortunate. If there remains interest in this topic, the article Iris Flores is sufficiently new and is essentially the same fact (president of the El Alto Municipal council at 20-years-old). Though I don't know if it would be considered long enough. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 22:15, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
- I read the article, it is long enough, but it is a municipal council not a vice ministry. I didn't find a hook interesting enough of a nomination, but you know her biography and also the region better and might find one.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 22:41, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
- That's unfortunate. If there remains interest in this topic, the article Iris Flores is sufficiently new and is essentially the same fact (president of the El Alto Municipal council at 20-years-old). Though I don't know if it would be considered long enough. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 22:15, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
- Already wanted to reply it was created yesterday but..., it was created last November 2021. Thanks for being so attentive. I guess this then makes it a no show.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 21:01, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
- New? Its a great article but is it less than a week old? Victuallers (talk) 11:38, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
... its not new enough. Thats it. Appeal on the talk page if this feels like an exception. Victuallers (talk) 22:44, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Closing nomination as failed due to the age of the article. It would become eligible for DYK if it achieves good article status. Flibirigit (talk) 02:16, 31 January 2022 (UTC)