Template:Did you know nominations/Children’s Memorial Health Institute

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 ^talk 16:27, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Children's Memorial Health Institute

(

)

... that the Children's Memorial Health Institute (pictured) was founded as a monument to the heroism and martyrdom of children during World War II?

Comment: Created today, basing mostly on the Polish Wiki page. Thought I might nominate it for DYK to attract more contributors.

Created by Halibutt (talk). Self nom at 13:56, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

This article has no sources whatsoever. May I offer DYK Rules as a guideline? Every paragraph needs inline citations. Duplication detector will be run to check those sources for copyvio and close paraphrasing. The hooks needs to be sourced at the end of the article's sentence that refers to it. — Maile (talk) 16:57, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Put a notification on nominator's talk page. — Maile (talk) 17:00, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Didn't know DYK switched from propagating new articles to some sort of GA promotion. Anyway, added some refs, hope that helps. //Halibu tt 11:53, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

The rules I linked you to have been out there for years. — Maile (talk) 15:23, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Ok, so what happens now? Anyone? //Halibu tt 17:39, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Better, but each paragraph must have at least one inline source citation, and neither of the final two paragraphs have them. It doesn't make sense to call in a new reviewer until these are supplied. Note that a specific inline source that ties together the hook statement—that the institute in particular was founded a monument to the WWII children—is needed in the article. I'm sorry if I missed it; the reviewer will need to find one. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:28, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Ok, I'll know better next time. Forget about this one, the 5-day-mark has already passed anyway. BTW, it seems it's much better to write a one-para article with two refs than to start a decent article that needs plenty of sources. If I wanted to meet the FA standards from the start, I would create the article in my user space and work on it there (as I did with my other FAs), there wouldn't be any need to attract more help from the community by using DYK. Anyway, thanks for the explanation. //Halibu tt 12:42, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Once you nominate it, the five-day rule is satisfied; it's not at all unusual to have some back and forth as the article is brought into compliance. If you want to continue, please feel free. If there are no sources like the one I requested above to cover the hospital as a monument, you can offer an alternate hook or two that are covered by your sources (including adding new material with those sources to support a new hook). If you don't want to continue, we can close the nomination for you. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:11, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

I added new anchors to paras without refs, plus one more external source to confirm data. All DYK requirements are met as of now. Hook well supported. Good to go. Poeticbent talk 18:17, 28 November 2012 (UTC)