Template:Did you know nominations/Central Leather Research Institute
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PanydThe muffin is not subtle 14:46, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Central Leather Research Institute
[edit]- ... that Central Leather Research Institute, which was founded in 1948 in Chennai, is the world's largest center of its kind?
- Reviewed: 2000 Summer Olympics torch relay
- Comment: 5x expansion
Created/expanded by Mspraveen (talk). Self nom at 08:07, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
- Please? Can we not say "of its kind". I speak as the cleverest, tallest, fattest, thinnest, stupidest and smallest person "of their kind" when I tell you that the boast needs to more specific Victuallers (talk) 13:40, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
- ALT 1 ... that Central Leather Research Institute, which was founded in 1948 in Chennai, is a leading institute in terms of research publications and patents? Mspraveen (talk) 06:24, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- Still far too vague. "Leading" among what group? Among all research institutes as a broad category? Among leather research institutes that happen to be located in Chennai? And how many publications and patents does one need to be "leading", anyway? —David Eppstein (talk) 21:39, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
- ALT 2 ... that the
erstwhileMadras State awarded 75 acres (30 ha; 0.117 sq mi) to the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research for the establishment of Central Leather Research Institute? Mspraveen (talk) 04:00, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
- Length, date, and various aspects of this article check out, and this article was new enough at the time of its nomination to be eligible. I struck "erstwhile" from the hook, as it is a bit awkward within the prose. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 04:20, 11 September 2012 (UTC)