Template:Did you know nominations/Catawissa Tunnel, Green Mountain Tunnel, Oneida Number One Tunnel, Oneida Number Three Tunnel
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 11:20, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Catawissa Tunnel, Green Mountain Tunnel, Oneida Number One Tunnel, Oneida Number Three Tunnel
[edit]( Back to T:TDYK )
( Article history links: )
- ... that the Audenried Tunnel, the Catawissa Tunnel, the Green Mountain Tunnel, the Oneida Number One Tunnel, and the Oneida Number Three Tunnel were all built in the Catawissa Creek watershed in the early 1930s?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Pah Wongso, Template:Did you know nominations/Everest (Indian TV series), Template:Did you know nominations/Aline (song), Template:Did you know nominations/Cindy Smart
- Comment: I'd boldlink the Audenried Tunnel article as well, but it's almost a year old (and was on DYK in December 2013). I know the hook is just over 200 characters, but perhaps an exception could be made since it's a quadruple nomination?
Moved to mainspace by Jakec (talk). Self nominated at 00:51, 18 October 2014 (UTC).
Hook is longer than 200 chars but that is permitted, as more than one article is featured in it. I wouldn't put the other article in bold.
Catawissa is new enough, long enough, and is neutral. It is appropriately sourced and the fact in the hook is in the article.
Oneida Number One is new enough, long enough, and is neutrally written. Each paragraph sourced, fact in hook sourced.
Green Mountain is long enough, new enough, and is sourced correctly. Fact in the hook is contained in the article.
Oneida Number Three is new enough, is long enough, and is appropriately sourced. The fact in the hook is sourced.
All articles appear to be free from copyright violations, and I cannot find issues with them. All four QPQs are done. Good to go. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 23:16, 20 November 2014 (UTC)