Template:Did you know nominations/Camille Cordahi 2
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Yoninah (talk) 20:30, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
not a 5x expansion
DYK toolbox |
---|
Camille Cordahi
- ... that Camille Cordahi (pictured) scored the Lebanon national football team's first goal? FA Lebanon; "[Camille Cordahi became Lebanon's first official goalscorer".]
5x expanded by Nehme1499 (talk). Self-nominated at 17:14, 21 October 2020 (UTC).
- General eligibility:
- New enough: - no
- Long enough:
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: - Not done
Overall: The article is not "new". This article is therefore not eligible for DYK unless it is expanded to GA status. Krakkos (talk) 21:08, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) The article currently has 4306 prose characters, and prior to expansion had 1368, so it's a bit over a 3x expansion when 5x is needed. Nehme1499, in order for this to qualify as a 5x expansion, it would need to grow to 6840 prose characters. Would you be able to add another 2534 prose characters to the article to make this a 5x expansion? You would also need to provide a QPQ review, since you have more than five prior DYK credits. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:49, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
- @BlueMoonset: Ah ok. I guess the DYK check is wrong (it says: "Assuming article is at 5x now, expansion began 8 edits ago on October 21, 2020"). I would have to say no, I can't add any more than what's present. Nehme1499 (talk) 21:56, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
- Nehme1499, that's odd. When I run DYKcheck on Camille Cordahi, in addition to giving the 4306 number, it says
Assuming article is at 5x now, expansion began 63 edits ago on August 10, 2020
. The size as of the edit immediately prior to August 10 was 831 prose characters; 4155 would be 5x of that. At any rate, if you can't expand further, then with regret I'll restore the other icon; at some point, if you get this to Good Article status, you can nominate it again then. If you're able to replicate the DYKcheck issue, please drop a note to Shubinator; we shouldn't be getting different results on the current version of the article page. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:01, 23 October 2020 (UTC) - (restoring icon from original review, since nominator will not be able to expand the article to 5x its original size). BlueMoonset (talk) 01:01, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Nehme1499, that's odd. When I run DYKcheck on Camille Cordahi, in addition to giving the 4306 number, it says
- @BlueMoonset: Ah ok. I guess the DYK check is wrong (it says: "Assuming article is at 5x now, expansion began 8 edits ago on October 21, 2020"). I would have to say no, I can't add any more than what's present. Nehme1499 (talk) 21:56, 22 October 2020 (UTC)