The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:27, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Página/12 (in Spanish). Quote: "The incident that became a homosexual hunt and became famous as the cadet scandal was only known by the newspapers of the time and by elusive witnesses (...). The alleged charge of corruption of minors was a subterfuge to hide the persecution of gays. (...) it was a homosexual hunt." ("El hecho que devino cacería homosexual y pasó a la celebridad como el escándalo de los cadetes solo se conocía por los periódicos de la época y por testigos esquivos. (...) Se alegaba supuesto cargo de corrupción de menores pero era un subterfugio para esconder la persecución a los gays. (...) era una cacería homosexual")
Página/12 (in Spanish). Quote: "Of all the versions of the 1942 Great Raid, which actually appears to have been not one but several raids..." ("De todas las versiones de la Gran Razzia de 1942, que en realidad parece que fueron no uno sino varios allanamientos")
Infobae (in Spanish.) Quote: "'The cadet scandal': the story of a great homosexual hunt in Argentina." ("'El escándalo de los cadetes': la historia de una gran cacería homosexual en la Argentina")
Overall: Article is well written, very in-depth and well-sourced. The hook is properly cited and interesting, I'm assuming good faith on all offline and/or Spanish sources. This was obviously a historically significant and well-documented event so I feel comfortable with that. I noticed a few minor typos and corrected them, but it's a solid article besides. Earwig did not pick up any copyvio. QPQ is not needed as nominator has fewer than 5 DYK credits. BuySomeApples (talk) 01:16, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Article is well written, very in-depth and well-sourced. The hook is properly cited and interesting, I'm assuming good faith on all offline and/or Spanish sources. This was obviously a historically significant and well-documented event so I feel comfortable with that. I noticed a few minor typos and corrected them, but it's a solid article besides. Earwig did not pick up any copyvio. QPQ is not needed as nominator has fewer than 5 DYK credits. BuySomeApples (talk) 01:16, 21 July 2021 (UTC)