Template:Did you know nominations/Boxheim Documents

Boxheim Documents

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

SPD poster for the 1932 Prussian state election using these documents to attack the NSDAP

• ... that in 1931, Werner Best drafted for the Nazi Party the plans for a coup?

• Source: Press and Politics in the Weimar Republic. OUP Oxford. pp. 186–187.

• ALT1: ... that under a Nazi plan for a coup, Jews were to be deprived of food rations? Source: https://www.jta.org/archive/jews-to-be-starved-out-if-hitlerists-come-to-power-boxheim-documents-were-authentic-official-statem
• ALT2: ... that a Nazi plan for a coup involved the abolishment of private income, food confiscations, and mandatory labour? Source: Press and Politics in the Weimar Republic. OUP Oxford. pp. 186–187.
• Reviewed:

Created by Jean Po (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Jean Po (talk) 15:40, 25 October 2024 (UTC).

• The article was made on the 25th, so is new enough. At many times the required length, it is long enough. The article reads neutrally and properly uses in-line citations. The copyvio detector finds nothing outside of explicit quotes in the article. Both hooks are interesting and cited in-line and utilized properly from the listed sources. The suggested image is in the public domain and visibly identifiable. No QPQ needs to be done. Looks good to go! Silverseren^C 01:20, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

@Jean Po, Silver seren, and Crisco 1492: I have pulled this hook on interestingness grounds. There is nothing whatsoever unusual about Nazis treating Jews poorly.--Launchballer 21:46, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

Okay, what about the original hook? I think that the Nazis were planning a full out coup, rather than their (admitted coerced through other events) political victory later, is interesting, particularly the effects that had at the time of the reveal of this plan. Silverseren^C 22:11, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

No comment on interestingness, but I have tagged uncited material in the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:17, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

@Jean Po: Please address the above.--Launchballer 01:25, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Citations added. --Jean Po (talk) 17:40, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

@Jean Po: Apologies for not responding earlier. ALT2 would need end-of-sentence citations rather than just trans tags.--Launchballer 13:16, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Done--Jean Po (talk) 13:40, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

It isn't.--Launchballer 02:29, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Launchballer, further edits were made yesterday. Do they suffice to supply the needed citations? BlueMoonset (talk) 02:23, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

It doesn't. It's the ones in the paragraph starting "In addition," that need end of sentence citations.--Launchballer 13:51, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

• @Jean Po, Silver seren, Launchballer, BlueMoonset, and AirshipJungleman29: It's only a few more days until DYKTIMEOUT can apply to the nomination. Are there still any outstanding issues that need to be addressed, and can they be done soon? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 01:36, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

  I still don't get what's wrong with the original hook and why we can't just go with that one. Silverseren^C 01:41, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

I find it to be much less interesting.--Launchballer 01:56, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

• seems fine to me.