Template:Did you know nominations/Bombing of Nagaoka in World War II

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:01, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Bombing of Nagaoka in World War II

(

)

Nagaoka after the raid.

... that during the bombing of Nagaoka in World War II, 80% of the urban area of the city was burned down?
- ALT1:... that during the bombing of Nagaoka in World War II, the 313th Bombardment Wing dropped 163,000 incendiary bombs totaling 925 tons in a 110 minute period?

Created/expanded by MChew (talk). Nominated by Iazyges (talk) at 21:22, 4 November 2016 (UTC).

Article is not long enough but new enough. Where is it said that Nagaoka was lacking targets of military significance? And the population number. I am also not sure if there being a more plausible reason for the air raid than Nagaoka being Yamamoto's hometown is the same thing as saying that it didn't play a role. The second paragraph may use a rewrite as it's fairly similar in wording with the source. One source is inaccessible. Hooks need the article link bolded, the first hook is better but I am not sure if "destroyed" and "burned down" here are equivalent. No QPQ needed. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:04, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Sorry MChew, but this article is slightly too short for DYK. . It seems there is ample material in the quoted sources with many details that could be added. I would also move the "Notes" to "Citations", a minor correction and not a requirement, just a suggestion. Maury Markowitz (talk) 15:28, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

@Maury Markowitz: I have expanded it to above the required amount. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 06:11, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Iazyges, while you expanded the article, and it is now long enough, you don't seem to have dealt with the issues raised by Jo-Jo Eumerus. Also, please note that hook facts need to be cited by the end of the sentence in which they occur; waiting until the end of the paragraph is not sufficient for DYK. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:06, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

I have reworded the second paragraph, and put a citation on the hook, I have removed some bits that I haven't been able to find citations for. I am looking for a citation for the population. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 01:03, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

I have been unable to find any source for the population, and have thus removed it. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 19:51, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Still a bit uncertain on I am also not sure if there being a more plausible reason for the air raid than Nagaoka being Yamamoto's hometown is the same thing as saying that it didn't play a role. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:49, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

That's not an issue for DYK to consider, the body text is referenced as it stands, so our job here is done. Maury Markowitz (talk) 13:05, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

@Jo-Jo Eumerus and Maury Markowitz: Your issues seem to have been addressed: are you comfortable signing off on this? Or are there further issues to consider? Vanamonde (talk) 12:25, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

I don't think my issue has been addressed; it still seems like the article says something different than the source. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:37, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

@Jo-Jo Eumerus: I have changed "does not" to "is unlikely", I think that fixes it suitably. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 13:09, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

My issue was length and that does appear to have been addressed. Maury Markowitz (talk) 12:46, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Did a re-review, I am concerned that "railway junction" does not appear in the source. Everything else seems fine. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:02, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

@Jo-Jo Eumerus: It has been removed. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 12:55, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

unless @Maury Markowitz: has more issues. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 13:25, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Nope, I'm good. Maury Markowitz (talk) 14:44, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Some of the information was misquoted from the cited sources. I fixed these up and also added some information about the peace statue. Yoninah (talk) 21:04, 22 January 2017 (UTC)