Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Battle of Port Gamble

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Matty.007 16:37, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Withdrawn by nominator

Battle of Port Gamble

[edit]

Created by BlueSalix (talk). Self-nominated at 01:19, 25 May 2014 (UTC).

  • Hook doesn't seem very hooky to me, perhaps something about the US only having one casualty? Or perhaps shorten it a bit. Swartout and Douglas eventually reached a compromise: the Haida were provisioned with food and new canoes, then dropped-off at the edge of Russian America. needs sourcing. Will do more review upon replies. Thanks, Matty.007 10:30, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
That's ridiculous. There's nothing all that interesting about a battle in which a steam age military incurred one casualty fighting against a bronze age enemy. However, of 60,000-odd battle deaths over 230 years the U.S. Navy has incurred, the very first one to occur in the Pacific Ocean is a chronological landmark. First, last, biggest, tallest, smallest - these are interesting things. "Less than usual, but not necessarily abnormal given conditions and circumstances," is not interesting. BlueSalix (talk) 20:07, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Well, it's your choice. Please source the bit I mentioned. Thanks, Matty.007 11:13, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Yes, I'd rather it not be in DYK at all than with such a trivial hook. I withdraw this nomination. BlueSalix (talk) 00:04, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
BlueSalix: are you sure? I was only suggesting a hook from my not-very-knowledgeable layman point of view, your hook will still be used if that's the one you want. Thanks, Matty.007 08:11, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
I'm sure. Thanks. BlueSalix (talk) 06:19, 4 June 2014 (UTC)