Template:Did you know nominations/Bathing Ghat, Bulandshahr
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk) 18:05, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Bathing Ghat, Bulandshahr
Bathing Ghat, Bulandshahr (2023)
- ... that 19th century construction of the bathing ghat (pictured) at Bulandshahr was delayed due to it being considered an "eye-sore"? Source: [1]
- Reviewed: Stanhope Demonstrator
5x expanded by Whispyhistory (talk). Self-nominated at 16:21, 22 February 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Bathing Ghat, Bulandshahr; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
Hi @Whispyhistory:, Can you show me the diffs before and after the 5x expansion?--Mhhossein talk 07:27, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
The prose is wells-sourced and long enough. Regarding the freshness issue, it was created on 14 Feb but was nominated 8 days later on 22 Feb. It was then 5xed after creation making it eligible for DYK. Though 1 day delay could be overlooked per DYK guidelines had the article been of a proper size. The hook is interesting and well sourced. What about the following wording:
- Alt0a:... that 19th century construction of the bathing ghat (pictured) at Bulandshahr was delayed because an executive engineer deemed it was an "eye-sore"?
- This one is more clear in terms of stating who considered the building to be an "eye-sore". --Mhhossein talk 07:57, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for ALT0a Mhhossein. I guess someone else is required to approve it please. Whispyhistory (talk) 05:59, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
