The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Rjjiiitalk 14:51, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Would be happy to review, but before I do, I think this article has a lot of potential as an April Fools' Day hook... as a reviewer I can't propose alt hooks, but if you have any ideas I'd love to get another hook slotted for April 1.
April Fool's Day hooks are really fun, but I think this would be too depressing for that, honestly. Generalissima (talk) 00:34, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Looks good to me. The hook is interesting, Earwig checked out, the source is reliable, QPQ is done. Lettlerhello • contribs 21:54, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Looks like this DYKN got all mangled for several reasons; see this screenshot. @MyCatIsAChonk: you placed your review below the <!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> comment. @Lettler: you placed your review on the talk page instead of the nomination page. Thanks, QueenofHearts 03:29, 25 March 2024 (UTC)