Template:Did you know nominations/Azar v. Allina Health Services

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 14:27, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Azar v. Allina Health Services

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that, according to the Supreme Court, Medicare payment levels count as "substantive legal standards"? Source: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/supreme-court-decides-azar-v-allina-19664/

• Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Emily Lloyd

Created by DannyS712 (talk). Self-nominated at 20:19, 5 July 2019 (UTC).

• This article is new enough and long enough. The hook facts are cited inline, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues, only the proper use of legal terms and phrases. A QPQ has been done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:12, 9 August 2019 (UTC)