Template:Did you know nominations/Astrobrachion constrictum

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 20:31, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Astrobrachion constrictum, Antipathes fiordensis

( Back to T:TDYK )

( Article history links:

)

... that the basket star Astrobrachion constrictum is always found living in association with a black coral such as Antipathes fiordensis?

Reviewed: Tukwila station
Comment: Also reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Hugh of Fauquembergues

Created by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 10:36, 2 March 2018 (UTC).

Well written, interesting articles. I especially like the fact that they complement each other. Shinryuu (talk) 22:56, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

@Shinryuu: you should provide a review that explicitly confirms that the five main DYK criteria have been met. A convenient Reviewer's Template is located above the edit window. Yoninah (talk) 22:55, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

I am sorry, was I supposed to explicitly mention in my review comment that the criteria have been met? This was not mentioned in Wikipedia:Did_you_know/Reviewing_guide, which I read before reviewing. I thought that posting the template (copied from the field above the edit window - is this what you meant?) was sufficient. However, I explicitly confirm that the five criteria had been met at the time I reviewed the article. Shinryuu (talk) 20:59, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

@Shinryuu: Please read "Finishing the review":
Type your review in the section for that nomination. You should begin your review with one of the five DYK review icons. This allows the nominator and other editors to more quickly understand your review decision, including the severity of any problems. It is also used by the bot to keep the tally of how many hooks have been passed. After posting the icon, indicate all aspects of the article that you have reviewed; your comment should look something like the following:
Article length and age are fine, no copyvio or plagiarism concerns, reliable sources are used. But the hook needs to be shortened.
Saying "all the five criteria have been met" does not indicate all aspects of the article that you have reviewed. Yoninah (talk) 22:52, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

@Yoninah: Again, my apologies, I must have missed that somehow. Here is my revised review of both articles:
At the time of their nomination, both articles had been created within the last seven days. The prose portion is longer than 1500 characters. By googling several sentences from either article, I could not find them on any other website except Wikipedia mirrors. The image used in both articles is in the public domain and hosted on the Wikimedia Commons. The hook is short and catchy, and I especially like the fact that it connects both articles. In my opinion, a clear thumbs up, both articles are good to go. Shinryuu (talk) 20:34, 18 March 2018 (UTC)