Template:Did you know nominations/Argentine seabass

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 19:18, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Argentine seabass

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

Argentine seabass near the Ilhas Cagarras, Brazil.

• ... that while bottom trawling is a viable method of commercial fishing for the Argentine seabass, it rarely occurs in areas where trawling is possible? Sources: Sadovy, Y.J. 2010. Acanthistius brasilianus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2010: e.T154987A4683767. "FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department. Argentine Seabass Entry". fao.org.

Created by Ryan shell (talk). Self-nominated at 19:12, 25 October 2021 (UTC).

• Reviewed Woman of the Chatti

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article needs some inline citations for some statements. Image would be hard to read at 100px, recommend cropping. Issues resolved. ~Gwennie🐈｟💬 📋｠ 23:49, 10 November 2021 (UTC) (updated 00:21, 21 December 2021 (UTC))

Comment I've tweaked the wording of some of the prose and added a number of new references. As far as the image goes, I am happy with the dyk entry with or without an image. cheers! Ryan shell (talk) 19:32, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

@Ryan shell: Appreciate you improving the reference issues. I've cropped the image on the commons and updated here. Do you approve of the cropped image? ~Gwennie🐈｟💬 📋｠ 13:39, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Yeah, it looks great! Thanks for that! Ryan shell (talk) 18:34, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Ryan shell, it seems the hook relies on information from two different sources, but this DYK only cites the one. I am ready to approve if you can add that source here. ~Gwennie🐈｟💬 📋｠ 17:01, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Done, Thanks for the reply Ryan shell (talk) 23:53, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Ryan shell I ran this by a few other veteran editors and was advised that we might need to try making the hook more clear and closer to the sources so the statement isn't more broad than the sources allow. ~Gwennie🐈｟💬 📋｠ 01:15, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Good point! Sorry for the extended hiatus. I've added a smoother version of the hook, modified from the article itself. Hope that helps! Ryan shell (talk) 17:04, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

@Gwennie-nyan? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she) 05:05, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

theleekycauldron, Gwennie-nyan hasn't edited on Wikipedia since December 1. If there isn't an edit here by December 22, three weeks after that edit, we should probably call for a new reviewer to check the updated hook. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:58, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

My apologies Ryan shell, Theleekycauldron, BlueMoonset, I have been working a ton of overtime this month. I have updated things appropriately and Approved the hook. ~Gwennie🐈｟💬 📋｠ 00:21, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

To T:DYK/P5 without image