Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Anti (Rihanna album)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Victuallers (talk) 12:30, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Anti (Rihanna album)

[edit]
  • ... that work on Anti, Rihanna's eighth studio album, began in 2013?

Created by Sullysully11 (talk). Nominated by SSTflyer (talk) at 10:08, 11 October 2015 (UTC).

  • Not eligible for DYK since the album currently fails WP:NALBUMS for no confirmed release date or full tracklist. Feel free to renominate when it has a confirmed release date and track list. Snuggums (talk / edits) 14:46, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
An article does not need to meet the stricter requirements of WP:NALBUMS if it meets WP:GNG. Your move of the article into draft space is inappropriate. sst 14:54, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
New reviewer needed. Restoring nomination history after prematurely closed by reviewer @SNUGGUMS:. A reviewer should not close out their own review. @SSTflyer: has challenged your review, and this nomination needs to be given a chance for others to look at it. WP:DYKR: ...an uninvolved editor will soon review the discussion and likely close it and promote the article. If the article does not qualify for DYK for some technical reason or if the participants cannot agree on at least one viable hook, the discussion will eventually be closed by an uninvolved editor and the article will not be promoted. — Maile (talk) 12:47, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Whoever looks at it should keep this in mind for why it DOES need to meet WP:NALBUMS in order to warrant an article in mainspace. Snuggums (talk / edits) 14:23, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
@SNUGGUMS: if the article does not meet notability guidelines, the place for that discussion is at AfD. DYK nominations are put on hold during AfD proceedings, and only restarted should the article be retained. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:35, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
  • The article has been nominated at Articles for Deletion; DYK nomination is on hold until the process concludes. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:45, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
  • The result of the AfD discussion was keep. sst 07:23, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
  • @SSTflyer: This nomination has been hanging around for rather a long time. The article was new enough when nominated and is long enough, in fact so long that I failed to find the hook fact. Can you direct me to it? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:32, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
  • @Cwmhiraeth: Apparently it has been removed from the article.
  • OK, going with ALT1 which has an inline citation. Length and newness criteria are met, the article is neutral, and spotchecks revealed no copyright issues. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:23, 11 November 2015 (UTC)