Template:Did you know nominations/Anti-trespass panels
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Lightburst (talk) 15:19, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Anti-trespass panels
![Anti-trespass panels at Breakneck Ridge station](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/08/Anti-trespass_panels_at_Breakneck_Ridge_station%2C_Fishkill%2C_NY.jpg/162px-Anti-trespass_panels_at_Breakneck_Ridge_station%2C_Fishkill%2C_NY.jpg)
Anti-trespass panels at Breakneck Ridge station
- ... that while studies have shown anti-trespass panels (pictured) do reduce intrusions into rail track areas, there is concern that they could also trap trespassers on the tracks? Source: "The overall number of trespass observations dropped by 38 percent ...", Effect of Anti-Trespass Guard Panels on Pedestrian Behavior, U.S. Federal Railroad Administration, 2019, p.15. "A pilot study conducted in 2014 in Belgium by INFRABEL evaluated the effect of this measure at a trespassing hotspot close to three schools and a level crossing. Anti-trespass panels were installed in combination with fences, warning signs and a surveillance camera. The number of trespassers during the three months after the implementation decreased with 78% compared to the three months before installation. A second assessment was done in 2015 and noted a 98% decrease in the number of intrusions ... In the Netherlands the first implementation was in 2014 by ProRail. Evaluation indicated trespass reductions between 30-90% depending on the configuration and problems ... Anti-trespass panels were tested in Sweden at 6 locations in the period 2016-2017. Test results showed an overall 38% reduction in numbers of trespassers" Anti-trespass panels, RESTRail, European Union. "A concern with the panels is trapping trespassers on the right-of-way if they entered at another point", Strategies for Deterring Trespassing on Rail Transit and Commuter Rail Rights-of-Way, National Academy of Sciences, p. 38.
![Anti-trespass panels at Viane-Moerbeke station, Belgium](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/28/Struikelmatten.jpg/162px-Struikelmatten.jpg)
Anti-trespass panels at Viane-Moerbeke station, Belgium
- ALT1: ... that anti-trespass panels (pictured) installed near rail tracks in Belgium almost completely eliminated the problem at some locations? Source: See above.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Walter Nash
Moved to mainspace by Daniel Case (talk). Self-nominated at 02:03, 3 May 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Anti-trespass panels; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Nice work Daniel Case. Both hooks are fine, though for ALT1 I'd change "the problem" to "trespassing" to clarify what the problem is. Epicgenius (talk) 12:46, 3 May 2023 (UTC)