Template:Did you know nominations/Almond production in Afghanistan
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 14:00, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Almond production in Afghanistan
[edit]
Almond trees in Zabul Province, Afghanistan
- ... that the preferred markets for export of Afghan almonds (almond trees pictured) are India and Pakistan, with the former preferred because of better profitability?
Created by Nvvchar (talk). Self-nominated at 07:47, 17 November 2015 (UTC).
Article is new enough, long enough, references check out (no apparent plagiarism) - Ref #2 need to include details on how to access the figures - Ref #7 need to fix accessdate in citation - Ref #8 no need for title to be capitalized & what is an odf?. In the last paragraph what does : 15 mean?
- The hook is short enough but I'm guessing that the hook should read "with the former preferred because of better profitability". Dan arndt (talk) 12:31, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
- @Nvvchar: you still have not addressed any of the other issues that I identified above. Dan arndt (talk) 15:21, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Dan arndt: Thanks for reminding me of non-compliance. Sorry about it. It was an oversight. I have fixed the errors and also added refs to tags. I hope it is ok now.Nvvchar. 04:03, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Dan arndt: Further to the above reply. I forgot to explain about ref 2. It is FAO statistical page covering all countries and entering Afghanistan, year, and the type of data referred gives the required fact. I got the information for 2012 for area harvested 13,490 ha, for yield 45,960 hg pr ha and total production as 62,000 tonnes. I thought it was clear. I am not aware of the procedure to explain it in the reference as the URL is the same for all three facts. Probably you can help. : 15 in the last section represents the page number of the pdf text.Nvvchar. 11:42, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
New review: Article is new enough, long enough, adequately referenced, neutrally written, no close paraphrasing seen. Hook ref verified and cited inline. (I tweaked the grammar in the hook.) All other cites appear to be in order. Image appears in article and is public domain. QPQ done. Good to go. Yoninah (talk) 21:18, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
