Template:Did you know nominations/All Nations Baptist Church
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PrimalMustelid talk 17:51, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
All Nations Baptist Church
- ... that All Nations Baptist Church is a church primarily associated with ethnic Koreans of the former Soviet Union in New York City? Source: [1]
Created by Toobigtokale (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 16 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.toobigtokale (talk) 03:22, 31 March 2024 (UTC).
Article is new enough but apparently too short. Going to AGF on most sources and these where I can see check out. I am not sure if the source supports the hook that it is a church for this specific group. No indication of copyvio or plagiarism, but that doesn't mean much when most sources are in another language. QPQ may benefit from some source spotchecking. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:30, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, thank you for the review! I expanded it, I think should be comfortably over the threshold now. Good catch on the use of the word "church"; I actually had the same thought early on, which is why the version you reviewed often used the word "congregation" (although it also used "church"). Upon further review, the English-language news article I provided seems to support the use of the word "church" (e.g.
Raised as a Catholic, she has been attending Baptist services at the church since 2012, she said.
), and it is consistently described in Korean as a church as well ("교회"). I swapped to "congregation" for now; hopefully this is an adequate compromise. toobigtokale (talk) 18:42, 1 April 2024 (UTC) - I also performed a few spot checks in the QPQ article. toobigtokale (talk) 19:27, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Misread your original feedback, sorry. I reworded the hook. While the proportion of Koryo-saram has dropped and the congregation is inclusive, the church is still regularly associated primarily with Koryo-saram in reliable sources. toobigtokale (talk) 07:34, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:54, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, thank you for the review! I expanded it, I think should be comfortably over the threshold now. Good catch on the use of the word "church"; I actually had the same thought early on, which is why the version you reviewed often used the word "congregation" (although it also used "church"). Upon further review, the English-language news article I provided seems to support the use of the word "church" (e.g.
