Template:Did you know nominations/Africa Express Presents... Terry Riley's In C Mali

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 12:19, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Africa Express Presents... Terry Riley's In C Mali

(

)

... that the pulse stops during the soliloquy of In C Mali?

Source: [1], [2]

ALT1: ... that Damon Albarn of Blur plays alongside West African musicians on In C Mali?

Source: [3], [4]

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Truncated icosahedron

Created by PerfectSoundWhatever (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 9 past nominations.

— PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 19:59, 5 July 2024 (UTC).

Comment regarding the article title – MOS:ELLIPSIS says: Generally, use a non-breaking space before an ellipsis, and a regular space after it. The article title does not have a space before the ellipsis and I see no good reason why the space should not be there. Let's clear this up before it goes to the main page; wouldn't want to see this being moved whilst it is on the main page. Schwede 66 05:23, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

@Schwede66: I would assume that MOS:ELLIPSIS is referring to how to write prose, not article titles. I can't find precedent that we conform ellipsis spacing to the MOS in titles. Here are some examples I found:

Endtroducing....., Let It Be... Naked, Oops!... I Did It Again (song), ...And Justice for All (album)

All sources use the "... " form. [5], [6], [7] (except Rolling Stone, which unspaces the ellipsis). Spacing the ellipsis in a way that no sources do would fail the "Naturalness" part of WP:CRITERIA. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 16:11, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

@Schwede66: Does the above address your concerns? Z1720 (talk) 01:56, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

I suppose so. If it's done quite commonly, we have a perfect rebuttal if somebody moans about it at Errors. Schwede 66 02:00, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

Concern above has been resolved. New reviewer needed. Z1720 (talk) 02:09, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

@PerfectSoundWhatever: Please supply a QPQ. Z1720 (talk) 23:27, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Now done. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 17:27, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

General eligibility:

New enough:
Long enough:
Other problems:

Policy compliance:

Adequate sourcing:
Neutral:
Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
Other problems:

Hook eligibility:

Cited:
Interesting:
Other problems:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: ~~PerfectSoundWhatever The Personnel section needs to be referenced. Everything else is fine.~~ SL93 (talk) 19:06, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the review. It is sourced, to Tangari 2015 (pitchfork). It is not common practice nor practical to have an inline citation on every personnel entry. I thought keeping it in plain-text rather than a citation allowed for better legibility. Let me know if there is a policy that disallows this formatting. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 19:11, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

There isn't. I missed the citation while reviewing. This is ready. SL93 (talk) 19:16, 27 July 2024 (UTC)