Template:Did you know nominations/Abdul Ghani Azhari
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk) 12:33, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Abdul Ghani Azhari
- ... that Abdul Ghani Azhari wrote Qadim Tarikh-e-Gujjar in Urdu, detailing the ancient history of Gujjars in India? Source: sourced in article
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Mass Incidents in China
- Comment: This seems a legit hook to me.
Created by TheAafi (talk). Self-nominated at 17:12, 20 January 2023 (UTC).
- @TheAafi: Can you write an article about Qadim Tarikh-e-Gujjar?–MinisterOfReligion (Talk) 18:39, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
- Although I feel we should have an article about this book, I have not got that much time right now to write about the book. Please also let me know if this is a general question or are you reviewing the DYK nomination? ─ The Aafī on Mobile (talk) 18:41, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
- General question.–MinisterOfReligion (Talk) 06:27, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Interesting:
- n
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
@TheAafi: To be honest, I don't think the hook is that interesting. Could another be proposed? Onegreatjoke (talk) 16:05, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- Onegreatjoke, Thanks for the review. What do you think about the following hook? I would be happy if you can make some changes to the hook with regards to style and grammar. ─ The Aafī (talk) 16:30, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that despite being interested in the Qadiri sufi order, Abdul Ghani Azhari published works on the Naqshbandi order?
- ALT1a: ... that Abdul Ghani Azhari published works on the Naqshbandi sufi order whilst being more interested in the Qadiri order?
- @Onegreatjoke:, in case you missed the previous ping? ─ The Aafī (talk) 10:16, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
- @TheAafi: Truthfully, I don't think that these are that interesting either. Maybe i'm not seeing it but I don't find these all that interesting. Onegreatjoke (talk) 18:19, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Onegreatjoke:, Alt1a appears pretty much interesting and hooky to me and perhaps you are not getting it because this belongs to a subject where you don't contribute. It is okay and you can leave the nomination to be reviewed once again by someone else who knows the subjective stuff perhaps. ─ The Aafī (talk) 00:20, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- @TheAafi: Truthfully, I don't think that these are that interesting either. Maybe i'm not seeing it but I don't find these all that interesting. Onegreatjoke (talk) 18:19, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Another reviewer is requested to take a look at this. Gazal world would you likely be available to re-review this nomination? ─ The Aafī (talk) 00:36, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
New enough, long enough, neutrally written, well referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. ALT0 is interesting; hook ref verified and cited inline. QPQ done. ALT0 good to go. --Gazal world (talk) 17:28, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
