Template:Did you know nominations/Aaron Hawkins
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:33, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Aaron Hawkins (engineer)
- ... that Aaron Hawkins uses nail polish to guide laser light into optofluidic devices for detecting antibiotic resistance? Source: Hollingshead, Todd (March 6, 2019). "Secret to lab-on-a-chip breakthrough: Matte black nail polish". TechXplore. Retrieved 2019-10-31.
- Reviewed: Independence (steamboat)
- Comment:
The AfD for the article was withdrawn, but (assuming this is approved) I think we should wait for the requested move to close before posting this (and if it does get moved, to update the hook for the new location). I am creating the nomination now anyway, because I have no idea how long it will take to close or whether it will be soon enough for the article to still be eligible for DYK nomination when it does.Move made, links updated.
5x expanded by Russ Woodroofe (talk), Nsk92 (talk), Vycl1994 (talk), and David Eppstein (talk). Nominated by David Eppstein (talk) at 23:00, 31 October 2019 (UTC).
- The previous edit summary is incorrect. I have not touched this disambiguation page or any of the related articles. bd2412 T 16:50, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
5x expansion is new enough, long enough, neutrally written and cites sources with inline citations. Full name/DOB cited to published dissertation, so no BLP issue there. Earwig matches are properly cited quotations. Proposed hook is interesting to a broad audience, short enough, and supported with an inline citation. QPQ completed by nominator. Looks good to go, but this is my first review, so the opinion of a second reviewer would not hurt my feelings. Indignant Flamingo (talk) 21:23, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
