Template:Did you know nominations/2021 Illinois vs. Penn State football game
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 08:34, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
2021 Illinois vs. Penn State football game
- ... that the 2021 Illinois vs. Penn State football game was the first in NCAA history to reach nine overtimes? Source: Illinois stuns No. 7 Penn State 20-18 in NCAA’s 1st 9OT game
- Comments: I am going to continue to expand this article (game summary prose, aftermath section, etc.), hopefully to the point of a GA nomination, but I wanted to go ahead and nominate for DYK now.
- Follow-up comment: I have completed the expansion and the article is currently listed as a GA nominee.
Created by PCN02WPS (talk). Self-nominated at 17:46, 26 October 2021 (UTC).
- Reviewing now...
General eligibility:
- New enough:
- Long enough:
- Other problems:
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Interesting:
- Other problems:
- There is a citation within the article that confirmed its truthiness, though the actual fact doesn't seem to appear in the body of the article. I understand this is probably for flow reasons (the article does state that this is the first game to reach 8OT, so it might be strange to also say it was the first to reach 9OT). Minor thing I think, but wanted to flag it.Fixed, see below
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
A very good article with a very interesting fact to boot. I think the body of the article needs to be more explicit about the 9OT fact though (it's in the lede but not in the body, where it instead talks about 8OT), and you haven't yet done your QPQ, but other than that I think it's good to go. Nice job. Looks ready! — 🦊 09:06, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Fox: thanks for the review! Good catch - I agree with your rationale and I've added the fact from the hook/lead directly into the body as well. QPQ has been done and noted above. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 16:51, 4 November 2021 (UTC)