Template:Did you know nominations/2017 IWBF Asia-Oceania Championships
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:33, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
2017 IWBF Asia-Oceania Championships
[edit]- ... that the Aussie Rollers won the 2017 Asia-Oceania Wheelchair Basketball Championships, while the Aussie Gliders came second? Source: [1][2]
Created by Hawkeye7 (talk). Self-nominated at 01:52, 30 October 2017 (UTC).
- @Hawkeye7: please make your link to the DYK article bold in the hook! Correct person credited. The article is just new enough, and just big enough. Although there are references they nearly all come from IWBF which suggests that notability is not yet proved. To show that, I reckon we should see at least one more independent reference on the topic. The hook is in the article and cited, and supported by the two references. The hook is short enough, and thanks to the unusual team names it is interesting enough. QPQ done, no copyvio detected. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:01, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
- Added two references, from different sources. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 11:24, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
- extra references prove notability, and hook is now formatted OK, so it is good to go. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:04, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
- Added two references, from different sources. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 11:24, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Hawkeye7: please make your link to the DYK article bold in the hook! Correct person credited. The article is just new enough, and just big enough. Although there are references they nearly all come from IWBF which suggests that notability is not yet proved. To show that, I reckon we should see at least one more independent reference on the topic. The hook is in the article and cited, and supported by the two references. The hook is short enough, and thanks to the unusual team names it is interesting enough. QPQ done, no copyvio detected. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:01, 31 October 2017 (UTC)