Template:Did you know nominations/2016 Football League Two play-off Final
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 02:56, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
2016 Football League Two play-off Final
- ... that AFC Wimbledon were promoted for a sixth time since their formation in 2002 when they won the 2016 Football League Two play-off Final?
- ALT1:... that AFC Wimbledon were promoted for a sixth time since their formation in fourteen years when they won the 2016 Football League Two play-off Final?
5x expanded by The Rambling Man (talk). Self-nominated at 15:02, 25 January 2021 (UTC).
- The article went from 797 characters to 8,144 by my count and it appears to be well-formatted and well-written, and the QPQ review has been completed. The blurbs are interesting enough, but I don't love the grammar of ALT1; did you mean to write that blurb as "for a sixth time in fourteen years"? Unfortunately, I can't give a check mark yet because the first paragraph of the background section is completely unreferenced. The supplemental guidelines call for at least one cite per paragraph, which should just about be sufficient for the one in question if the right source can be found. Consider it a pre-GAN cleanup, since a future GA reviewer is likely going to bring that up. Anyway, the hook fact is supported by the source, and the others I checked (the other usage of ref 12 and refs 5 and 9) adequately backed the content with no close paraphrasing, so that paragraph is my only issue. Giants2008 (Talk) 02:26, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Giants2008 thanks for the review, the para in question was a remnant and I was supposed to have removed it. So good spot! It's now gone. Cheers. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 07:37, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Much better. Everything looks good to go now. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:09, 26 January 2021 (UTC)