Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/2008 Indian Premier League Final

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 11:26, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

2008 Indian Premier League Final

[edit]

Shane Warne

Created/expanded by Vibhijain (talk). Self nom at 16:05, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

  • Surprisingly, the hook facts are derived from the caption of an image, no where in the article they exist. The reference provided is a web page which has a label of All rights reserved.  MehrajMir ' (Talk) 08:06, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
  • I guess that you need to have an another look. I don't think that thee is any policy which says that the fact presented in the hook should be cannot be derived from a caption. And another point is, one is completely free to cite a copyrighted website. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 10:04, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
  • 1) The source is fine, I see no way by this is not a RS. 2) Fivefold had nothing to do here. It is a completely new one. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 15:45, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
  • There‘s another concern regarding QPQ, the latest QPQ from the list provided was done on 8 June 2012. The nominator will say there‘s no rule for this too. Therefore, let the other reviewers to review.  MehrajMir ' (Talk) 16:55, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
  • This is really getting out of my control. Sorry if I am sounding harsh, but is this your first DYK review? I have 11 reviews, so I don't need to do another till I have 99 DYK credits. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 17:02, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
  • ; article is new enough and long enough. Sources are reliable and cover the contents of the hook. QPQs are done, although only one is needed. Image has an appropriate licence for the main page, and to be used as free content. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 18:24, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
  • QPQ is not done. The 11 reviews cited by Vibhijain above have long since been used up: one QPQ is required per review, not 11 for 99 DYK credits. A new QPQ must be done for every nomination, including this one. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:02, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
  • A drive-by comment: Please mention the sport in the hook. Thanks. --PFHLai (talk) 18:18, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Is US Open for tennis only? usopen.com is a website for a golf tournament. IPL? People in the Indonesian Premier League play football. See WP:DYKSG#C2. Please don't ask us to repeat past errors of omission. Thanks. --PFHLai (talk) 18:13, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
  • I agree, but the short has not been used in the hook. Anyone who doesn't knows about IPL can check the article. Also IPL is not a minor league, it is the world second most paid league. However if you still feel that the sport should be included, I can live up with that. But please do give a thought to my comment. Thanks! :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 15:27, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Hmmm... you want readers of MainPage to click and read about IPL, rather than your DYK article? I don't think so....  :-) --PFHLai (talk) 15:15, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
  • QPQ completed, grammar fixes made to hook so it makes sense (and added "cricket" per PFHLai), rest of review per Thine Antique Pen. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:25, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
I've moved the word "cricket" further down the hook. Thanks. --PFHLai (talk) 15:15, 2 September 2012 (UTC)