The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 10:05, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
Overall: Needs QPQ, otherwise OK. GTG, nice article. Crum375 (talk) 12:06, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
@Crum375:, thanks for the review. Added QPQ. Also made some grammatical/typographical updates to the hook for readability. Longhornsg (talk) 04:48, 10 July 2023 (UTC)