Talk:Potiphar's wife

Judaism Low‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Bible Low‑importance

	Bible portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ancient Near East Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ancient Near East–related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ancient Egypt Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egyptological subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient EgyptTemplate:WikiProject Ancient EgyptAncient Egypt

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ancient Egypt to-do list:

Needed articles.

We should have an article on every pyramid and every nome in Ancient Egypt. I'm sure the rest of us can think of other articles we should have.

Cleanup.

To start with, most of the general history articles badly need attention. And I'm told that at least some of the dynasty articles need work. Any other candidates?

Standardize the Chronology.

A boring task, but the benefit of doing it is that you can set the dates !(e.g., why say Khufu lived 2589-2566? As long as you keep the length of his reign correct, or cite a respected source, you can date it 2590-2567 or 2585-2563)

Stub sorting

Anyone? I consider this probably the most unimportant of tasks on Wikipedia, but if you believe it needs to be done . . .

Data sorting.

This is a project I'd like to take on some day, & could be applied to more of Wikipedia than just Ancient Egypt. Take one of the standard authorities of history or culture -- Herotodus, the Elder Pliny, the writings of Breasted or Kenneth Kitchen, & see if you can't smoothly merge quotations or information into relevant articles. Probably a good exercise for someone who owns one of those impressive texts, yet can't get access to a research library.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Title includes word "legendary"

Why is the word "legendary" in the title of this article? The word "legendary" isn't in the title of the article on Potiphar. Agreed that the article includes a legendary story about her, but her existence seems no less legendary than Potiphar's. DelRayVA192.31.106.34 16:12, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Potiphar is named in the Bible, but his wife is not. Her name is in Legend, but not in Scripture. Erudil 21:19, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

There were no oranges in ancient Egypt. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.110.235.47 (talk) 04:20, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you read the Qur'an, it doesn't refer to them as oranges at all. Perhaps an error in earlier texts. 220.253.13.86 (talk) 12:21, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Upper-class ladies of ancient Egypt would not had peeled their own fruit. They had servants for that. Das Baz, aka Erudil 19:39, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 2 May 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Page moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jerm (talk) 22:29, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Zuleikha (tradition) → Potiphar's wife – Like Pontius Pilate's wife (traditionally Claudia Procula), Manoah's wife (traditionally Zelelponith), Pharaoh's daughter (Exodus) (traditionally Bithiah), and Queen of Sheba (traditionally Bilkis), a name not found in the primary source(s) should not be used as the article title. Also per WP:COMMONNAME in English. — the Man in Question (in question) 22:01, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support move per nom - it's very clearly the common name in English sources. St Anselm (talk) 01:07, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support, e.g. Lot's wife (Ado or Edith). 62.165.200.11 (talk) 18:22, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others. Johnbod (talk) 00:17, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support, but note that she's usually called "Potiphar's wife" or "the wife of Potiphar" in English. The same is true of the other examples given above. But if she were more widely known as "Zuleikha", then that would be the right title. There are a lot of persons not directly named in the Bible, whose names are known from other sources or traditions—sometimes conflicting ones. The decision needs to be based on how the person is most widely known, not whether that name or title is found in a particular source. P Aculeius (talk) 23:41, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Right, I did not speak of a particular source. I said "the primary source(s)". So if a name were not found in the Bible but found, for example, in Herodotus, that would still be a primary source. — the Man in Question (in question) 03:02, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:07, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom In ictu oculi (talk) 21:34, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.