Talk:Zipit Wireless Messenger

Radio Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

Renamed the page

I renamed the page to reflect the full name of the device. I neglected to state a reason why when I did the move, so please don't think I did so without good reason. Zipit will now redirect to Zipit Wireless Messenger. Gh5046 (talk) 10:56, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal for page rename

This article covers both versions of the ZipIt. I propose an article name change to Zipit Wireless Messenger (series). Or atleast splitting the article into 2 sections. The information meshes too much. 65.185.147.196 (talk) 21:39, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A section for each device would be fine by me, I don't believe the page should be renamed as they both have the same name, except for the suffix. Gh5046 (talk) 22:36, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rename

I renamed the page to reflect the full name of the device. The Zipit Wireless Messenger (Z2)! This is what most websites see it as,and it states the latest series. I also added full details. Zipit Wireless Messenger will now redirect to Zipit Wireless Messenger (Z2). Trin20t (talk) 10:31 AM February 2009 (EST)

SD accurate?

There seem to be myriad non-WP:RS (fora, Hunter Davis's blog, etc) with reports of 4gb and 8gb mini-SDHC cards successfully used, but are there others, or is it a secure enough statement-of-fact to stand without a cite? MrZaius^talk 14:27, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Zipit wireless messenger (Z2). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:14, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]