This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mormonism and the Latter Day Saint movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latter Day Saint movementWikipedia:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementTemplate:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementLatter Day Saint movement articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
I've removed the Notability and Refimprov tags. I believe there are enough independent sources covering Zions Bank to show that the bank is notable, and I've added a number of references to the article body. Kris247 (talk) 04:07, 11 January 2013 (UTC) — Kris247 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
I didn't agree with the notability tag in the first place, so I'm going to just ignore that. One 12 year old article from the Deseret News, and one more recent article from LDS Church News about a building being dedicated doesn't get you even half way to having enough citations to remove the refimprove tag. We still need more refs, especially from sources outside of the Mormon Corridor. -- 208.81.184.4 (talk) 00:49, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I've restored many of the edits made by unforgettableid made on April 04, 2013. I don't fundamentally disagree that some of the information is better housed on the bank's website, but there is plenty of precendent for these sections within other bank articles on Wikipedia. Further, many of the "minor" edits substantially changed the tone of the article.
Kris247 (talk) 15:21, 19 April 2013 (UTC) — Kris247 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Dear sir: The main goal of my work was to remove puffery and advertorial content from the article. You undid my work. I have restored my work. I have also placed {{uw-coi}} and {{uw-advert1}} notices on your user talk page. Please read the notices carefully. Yes, I know I removed the "Corporate Social Responsibility" section that you worked hard to write, and I know that it is frustrating to see content removed after you have worked hard to write it. But like I said, it does not belong on Wikipedia. In fact, I am considering nominating the Zions Bank article for complete deletion, due to the advertorial content introduced by users like you. Kind regards, —Unforgettableid (talk) 03:59, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]