Jump to content

Talk:Zinc Application Framework

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Zinc Application Framework. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:24, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Proposed deletion

[edit]

The article has been proposed for deletion on 15:35, 19 May 2018 by 2.142.245.8. When I saw someone attempting to blank the page, complaining about lack of reliable sources, I first attempted to help them by proposing deletion (WP:PROD) of the article. However, I have now noticed that this had already been done before, and can not be done again in this way. If you would still like to nominate the article for deletion, please have a look at WP:AfD. Please note that the article might not meet the strict deletion criteria of this process. Instead of blanking the article, a good way to fix the problem might be finding reliable sources and adding them to the article (WP:CITE). Thank you very much in advance. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:32, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This article has been in need for citations for reliable sources for many years and no one has been able to find them. It is time to remove unreferenced content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.87.132.234 (talk) 16:44, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]