Talk:Zeya Dam

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Zeya Dam article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Dams Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dams, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dams on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DamsWikipedia:WikiProject DamsTemplate:WikiProject DamsDam articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Russia Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge proposal

I propose to merge Zeya Reservoir into this article. Both articles are very closely interrelated. As both articles are stubs, merging will help to create a more comprehensive article. Beagel (talk) 14:10, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. There are a lot of articles about water reservoirs and power plants of high quality (ru:Баксанская ГЭС, ru:Саяно-Шушенская ГЭС, ru:Чебоксарская ГЭС, Rampart Dam, Grand Coulee Dam, Hoover Dam (Lake Mead), Llanishen Reservoir, ru:Усть-Илимское водохранилище, ru:Куйбышевское водохранилище, Churchill Falls Generating Station (Smallwood Reservoir) etc). Also many different iwiki for dam and reservoir.--Insider (talk) 13:28, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Fact, that there are a lot of articles about water reservoirs and power plants of high quality is not a valid argument. So far, neither of the articles under question can't be classifies as "article of high quality". The question is if there is enough reliable and verified information to keep separate articles? At the moment the answer is 'no'. Probably there is potential to have separate decent articles in the future, but it could be done later when there is enough verified and sourced information about the reservoir as a separate body not related to the dam. Also, in general existence of iw links is not an argument for arranging the English wiki, although there may be cases when this should be considered. Beagel (talk) 06:14, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support Separate articles should only apply when both are substantial in size and coverage along with being notable apart.--NortyNort (Holla) 10:27, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Zeya Dam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.lhp.rushydro.ru/works/objectsmap/5687.html
Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20111003043548/http://www.hydroproject.ru/data/building/objekt/zeisk.php to http://www.hydroproject.ru/data/building/objekt/zeisk.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:12, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]