Talk:Zepotha

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 24 October 2023 by reviewer Robert McClenon (talk · contribs).

Internet culture

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

TikTok

This article is within the scope of WikiProject TikTok, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of TikTok on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TikTokWikipedia:WikiProject TikTokTemplate:WikiProject TikTokTikTok articles

Comments

This draft has been deleted multiple times due to being a blatant hoax (WP:G3), and due to this simply being nothing more than a TikTok trend, this is definitely not relevant and encyclopedic enough (the lack of credible sources shows this) to have its own Wikipedia article about it. Although Goncharov is a similar incident which has its own article, it seems to be much more defined and 'widespread' as a fictional movie. This is nothing more than a TikTok trend to promote the creator's music. If this doesn't again fail G3, it definitely fails WP:GNG and likely other regulations. B3251 (talk) 22:10, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yup. There is no possibility of an article being accepted without substantially more coverage. AndyTheGrump (talk) 22:24, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unlike all the other drafts that have been created in relation to this, this one actually mentions it's a hoax, so that should probably disqualify it from G3. But yes, notability seems to remain an issue. I find it hard to believe this will have much lasting significance. These trends happen all the time, and they don't all result in articles. The only thing that is different about this one is that it involves some kind of purported fact that people want to spread, and they're spreading it here. —⁠PlanetJuice (talk • contribs) 00:14, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Although that is true, the only sources that are (and can only be) used are either the TikTok themselves (not really an encyclopedically usable source) as well as less-reliable sources that cover these types of trends all the time, nothing that indicates sustainable significance whatsoever so chances are it'll fail GNG. B3251 (talk) 01:36, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]