Jump to content

Talk:Zenshūyō

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Anraku-ji

[edit]

As a result of the investigation in 2004, Anraku-ji's Pagoda is causing the possibility that is the building completed in around 1290. --663highland (talk) 10:47, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

663highland

[edit]

663highland, I am sorry, but you cannot delete a solidly referenced sentence (there is even a link, so anybody can read the original. Check it out) simply because YOU think those given are not good examples. Between you and a book anybody will trust the book, especially since you don't specify your reasons and you give no alternative list. The Shariden is mentioned as an example even by the Japanese 善様 article. Bring a list of examples from a good Japanese source and I will instantly use it instead of mine. Frank (Urashima Tarō) (talk) 01:47, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the message, Urashimataro.
Kōzan-ji's butsuden in Shimonoseki, Zenpuku-in's shaka-dō, and Anraku-ji's pagoda are three most important buildings in Zen'yō. It is recognized that they are the buildings of the Zen style of Kamakura Period, and have universal value. The reference for that exists innumerably. Neither the belfry at Tōdai-ji, the Founder's Hall at Eihō-ji nor the shariden at Engaku-ji are the most appropriate examples. They are buildings built in Muromachi Period. Even in a Japanese version of Wikipedia, they can be confirmed.
Engaku-ji's shariden that thinks that Mr. Urashimataro is important is a building built in the middle of Muromachi Period. In addition, Engaku-ji's shariden has shattered in Great Kanto Earthquake. Present Engaku-ji's shariden is the one rebuilt by using a part of the shattering wood. Quite a lot of new wood are used for it.
  • books (For the reference. )
    • 日本建築史図録 〈鎌倉 上〉 天沼俊一 / 東京堂出版 1996/06
    • 日本建築史図録 〈鎌倉 下〉 天沼俊一 / 東京堂出版 1996/06
--663highland (talk) 02:38, 5 October 2010 (UTC)02:49, 5 October 2010 (UTC)663highland (talk) 02:54, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]


OK, now, with evidence, we can change the text. Either you do it and I correct it or I can do it, as you refer. In either case we need the number of the page or pages, to write in the reference. The page number in the book is necessary. Can you add it? Frank (Urashima Tarō) (talk) 02:55, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry. It does sooner or later though it is not possible to do right now. I concurrently look for information that exists in the web. --663highland (talk) 03:05, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]