Talk:Zaziemskie światy

Zaziemskie światy is currently a Language and literature good article nominee. Nominated by _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} at 15:26, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page.

Short description: 1948 science fiction novel by Władysław Umiński

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 7 September 2024 by reviewer SafariScribe (talk · contribs).

Intertranswiki/OKA

This article has been created, improved, or expanded by a translator from the Open Knowledge Association. See the OKA task force page of WikiProject Intertranswiki.Intertranswiki/OKAWikipedia:WikiProject Intertranswiki/OKATemplate:WikiProject Intertranswiki/OKAOKA

Novels: Sci-fi Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Science fiction task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Poland Low‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Zaziemskie światy/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Piotrus (talk · contribs) 15:26, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: SirBrahms (talk · contribs) 06:44, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will be reviewing this Article! Expect an initial review in around 24 hours. Regards, SirBrahms (talk) 06:44, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is my initial review:

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Prose, spelling and grammar is good, but the Reception section should really be longer, so I marked 1b as fail for now. I've yet to do a spot check of the sources (sorry) I will be adding that later today. The copyvio detector found almost nothing, so I've passed that criterion. The article is focused and focuses on what's important about the book, although I do think the Section on the History of Creation could also be expanded. The page seems pretty stable (there aren't many edits in general). The article is critically lacking any images, so if there are images of the book cover, for example, that could really add to the article.
Thank you and regards, SirBrahms (talk) 07:55, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]