Jump to content

Talk:Zapolyarny District

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Districts

[edit]

I counted at least nine uses of the word 'district' before the table. It was time to use the dictionary. RASAM (talk) 14:22, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you're going to post snotty comments about other editors' work, do try not to make elementary errors as it makes you out to be a bit foolish. The word you are looking for is Thesaurus. Maybe it's time you used the dictionary, or perhaps just be civil and delete this section? Fenix down (talk) 14:34, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am responding to your 'snotty comments' remarks above. I would have done so earlier, but this page was not on my watchlist (I did not think it was necessary), so I have only just seen what you have written.
I wanted to reduce the number of 'districts' because on reading the article aloud (one of the MOS editing guide-lines), it jarred.
I wrote that "It was time to use the dictionary" for one very simple reason, I do not possess a Thesaurus. On my late father's passing, I acquired not one, but two dictionaries, but sadly, no Thesaurus. Therefore, I was trying to use the dictionary as a sort of Thesaurus to diminish the number of 'districts'. It would seem that I was not trying hard enough, I was merely trying to explain my actions.
On looking at this article's edit history, I see that Fenix down, under the 'author' tag, features quite a lot, maybe he/she is among the "other editors" mentioned above.
Perhaps Father Christmas (Santa Claus) will bring me a Thesaurus in December; or should that read: "Perhaps Father Christmas will bring me a Thesaurus at Christmas for Christmas". On receiving said book, might my errors not be so elementary?
Regards
PS. Delete? Perish the thought!
PPS. I only came to this page for some information.
RASAM (talk) 13:49, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Zapolyarny District. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:41, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]