Talk:Zanata Stone
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Forgery
[edit]Can we rewrite the article already stating that the piece is an utter forgery as stated by professors like Renata Springer since its very "discovery"? https://www.ull.es/portal/noticias/2019/investigadoras-de-la-catedra-cultural-de-estudios-bereberes-de-la-ull-aseguran-que-la-inscripcion-de-la-piedra-zanata-es-falsa/ --Il Qathar (talk) 10:57, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
- I don't know about rewriting the article, but there's nothing stopping us from adding the forgery claim to it. M.Bitton (talk) 13:45, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class Archaeology articles
- Unknown-importance Archaeology articles
- Stub-Class Africa articles
- Unknown-importance Africa articles
- Stub-Class Spanish Africa articles
- Unknown-importance Spanish Africa articles
- WikiProject Spanish Africa articles
- WikiProject Africa articles
- Stub-Class Spain articles
- Unknown-importance Spain articles
- All WikiProject Spain pages