Talk:Zamburak

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Zamburak article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / Middle East

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	Middle Eastern military history task force

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Spelling of Zumbooruk

This article used a different spelling of Zumbooruk each time it is mentioned!

I would suggest renaming the article Zumbooruk and in all links to it or use of it in the article to be changed to this single spelling. I'm pretty sure wikipedia has some sort of guidelines on this sort of thing.

It's a good job it's in these categories:

 Category:Middle Eastern military history articles needing attention to coverage and accuracy
 Category:Middle Eastern military history articles needing attention to referencing and citation
 Category:Military history articles needing attention to coverage and accuracy
 Category:Military history articles needing attention to referencing and citation
 Category:Military science and technology articles needing attention to coverage and accuracy
 Category:Military science and technology articles needing attention to referencing and citation
 Category:Weaponry articles needing attention to coverage and accuracy
 Category:Weaponry articles needing attention to referencing and citation

Doesn't wikipedia have something like operation cleanup for these sorts of articles?

File:Camel gun - pg 18 -The last voyage - Annie Brassey.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Camel gun - pg 18 -The last voyage - Annie Brassey.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Camel gun - pg 18 -The last voyage - Annie Brassey.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:46, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

colloquial term

camel gun — Preceding unsigned comment added by Setenzatsu (talk • contribs) 21:17, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

contraption

Vulcan cannon can be mounted upon a camel or war elephant as an experiment. 09:22, 10 February 2023 (UTC)09:22, 10 February 2023 (UTC)09:22, 10 February 2023 (UTC)09:22, 10 February 2023 (UTC)43.242.178.147 (talk)///////////////////////////09:22, 10 February 2023 (UTC)09:22, 10 February 2023 (UTC)43.242.178.147 (talk) 09:22, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

iFunny source

As of right now, the usage period's only reference is an iFunny image. Unless another source can corroborate the period, it probably should be removed from the article. VeeVic (talk) 00:01, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]