Talk:Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co.

A fact from Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co. appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 June 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the 1977 U.S. Supreme Court case Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co. dealt with the legal issues of broadcasting a human cannonball act without consent?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/June.

Wikipedia

U.S. Supreme Court cases Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Post-Supreme Court outcome

Does anyone know the result of this case after it was sent back to Ohio? Did they settle? Did the Ohio courts rule one way or the other on purely state grounds? Is the fight still going on today? (Well, it happened in Dickens, and they're still fighting over a ten year old nipple slip at the Super Bowl.)--Prosfilaes (talk) 11:14, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]