Talk:Zaïko Langa Langa

Zaiko Familia Dei was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 02 February 2012 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Zaïko Langa Langa. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Africa: DRC

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Democratic Republic of the Congo portal This article is supported by WikiProject Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Discography

A discography section would be nice. Zazaban (talk) 22:36, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done - finally. DBlomgren (talk) 03:09, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article name

Should it remain as is or should the name actually be Zaïko Langa Langa? I have no opinion as I know nothing about this band it's just that it struck me as an odd redirect to have for no reason and as such I hope that somebody more knowledgable might be able to clear this up. Thanks. Keresaspa (talk) 18:28, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tie in with Bimi Ombale article

There is a lot of crossover of Kaiko Langa Langa in the Bimi Ombale article. I suspect a lot of the information there should be here instead (if it can be verified, I'm also removing some of the old information as I suspect that it's POV. Version where the information is here (and not culled): [[1]]

NPOV

Article still has a lot of Neutral Point of View issues - opinions should be either deleted or given citations from relevant sources who are not connected with the band. For example, see 2nd & 3rd sentences. Also, imperfect English style and grammar (esp. wrong tenses of verbs) could use cleaning up. Acwilson9 (talk) 21:48, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Acwilson9: Thanks. I had the same reaction and was going to write that here, so just did it. Sullidav (talk) 13:49, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]