Talk:Yugoslav destroyer Split

Yugoslav destroyer Split has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: February 1, 2016. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Yugoslav destroyer Split article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Yugoslavia

	Yugoslav destroyer Split is within the scope of WikiProject Yugoslavia, a collaborative effort to improve the Wikipedia coverage of articles related to Yugoslavia and its nations. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.YugoslaviaWikipedia:WikiProject YugoslaviaTemplate:WikiProject YugoslaviaYugoslavia
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Maritime / Balkan / European / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Balkan military history task force (c. 500–present)
	European military history task force
	World War II task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

It is requested that an image or photograph of this ship during construction or three-views diagram be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Europe may be able to help!
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Title change

This article has been moved to include a disambiguation hull number. This move is unnecessary, as there is no other Yugoslav destroyer Split it can be confused with. R-11 also has no source in the article. It should be reverted to its original title. Peacemaker67 (send... over) 21:50, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Yugoslav destroyer Split/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 13:30, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

One dup link
Watch ENGVAR - I spy a "draught" in the infobox and a "harbour" in the body
Check the rounding for displacement - 3,000 long tons (3,048 t) would be better.
Since they were post-WNT ships, shouldn't LT still be the default for the La Fantasque class?
- The French generally still used metric tonnages unless forced to do otherwise like WNT business.
  - The French wanted to be contrarian - who would've guessed?
Some of this is unclear. What exactly is France's role in the building of the ship (apart from supplying radios)? If she's being built in Yugoslavia by Yarrow, why would the invasion of France have any relevance? And why would the French protest a British embargo?
- Fire-control systems and radios were French supplied.
You might add a line clarifying that Germany and Italy invaded Yugoslavia on 6 April - the city being captured by the Italians comes out of the blue for people who aren't familiar with the war.
- it's referred to in the lede. Is that not enough?
Link NATO. Parsecboy (talk) 13:30, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Sturmvogel 66: - I think this got lost in the shuffle. Parsecboy (talk) 13:18, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, just be being consumed by game playing. See if my changes suit.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:10, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looks fine to me, great work as usual. Parsecboy (talk) 13:04, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]