Jump to content

Talk:Yu-Gi-Oh! Trading Card Game

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Age range between OCG and TCG

[edit]

We need to keep that on the page. Cuz it shows the difference in how the demographic of the game is different between two different versions of the game. OCG is confirmed 12 and up as it says on the back of every pack: “対象年齢12才以上” (Translation: “Target age 12 years and older”) Which implies the game is for at least early teens. We need to expand more on the OCG and TCG information. This page shouldn’t be just TCG. 2601:589:4100:4B49:51BE:AA3E:20FE:D0AF (talk) 14:26, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Someone altered the age range of the OCG on here. I have evidence that it is 12 and up. 9 and up is only for Rush Duels. SG1994! (talk) 12:50, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
SG1994!, in case you show up again after noticing I changed it to 9+ again, know that whatever evidence you have is 10 years out of date, because OCG product since the 2015 booster pack "Clash of Rebellions" has been labelled with 9+. Here's a picture of the currently-latest pack with the age range clearly printed on the upper-right corner, as proof that it hasn't changed since. --XBrain130 (talk) 20:16, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Then edit it as “12 and up” from 1999 -2015
and “9 and up” 2015 and onwards. That way people can see how it was changed. It’s only fair as the game since 1999 and onwards was advertised for 12 and older SG1994! (talk) 04:53, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I’ve already discussed with you on how we can make this compromise work. 12 and up for 1999-2015 and then 9 and up for 2015 and onwards. Both can be applied here. But you have to be willing to accept that because there’s no reason to keep it at just nine and up. Because that would be lying to people and assuming that it’s always been the case when it clearly has not. SG1994! (talk) 00:04, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If you continue to ignore this, then you’re just gonna create an edit war. I’m trying to make this an easy thing for everyone. SG1994! (talk) 00:05, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
...are you for real? You cannot say "there’s no reason to keep it at just nine and up. Because that would be lying to people and assuming that it’s always been the case when it clearly has not" and then revert it to exactly as before. The reason is because that's how it is now, and and only saying how it was 10 years ago is an infinitely bigger lie! Do you not see how hypocritical that is??? I personally do not believe the past target age is relevant enough to mention, but if you really do then just add it yourself instead of reverting! You're the one who's making edit wars here. And what the hell do you mean by "provide proof"? I did above when I edited the first time! --XBrain130 (talk) 15:30, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No, you didn’t, bro. You didn’t provide any sufficient evidence on your case you’re the one starting to edit war and throwing a temper tantrum so keep believing in your own delusions. SG1994! (talk) 07:00, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Already done. Now you can leave it alone. SG1994! (talk) 07:04, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No, you're the one throwing a tantrum just because I'm replacing outdated information, I'm just irritated that my factual correction is being unjustly rebunked and called a lie. To be clear, I wasn't ignoring you before, I just didn't think of checking the talk page again because I thought the matter was already resolved given that (1) I wasn't reverted at first, (2) it was an anon to do it, and (3) it's the freaking truth. I provided a picture of a pack saying 対象年齢9才以上, how is that not sufficient evidence? How is it a delusion in any way?? I saw your talk page, you've been blocked that many times for edit-warring over things exactly like this, and you still act that way? I'd say you're the one having some weird delusional obsession over demographics. XBrain130 (talk) 12:53, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Surrendering in OCG?

[edit]

Currently, the article says "players can forfeit at any time." As far as I know, this is in TCG only. I remember reading players are not allowed to surrender in OCG, or they can surrender only after X number of turns.

Can OCG players confirm this? Preferably with reliable source. - Ivan530 (Talk) 19:02, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]