Talk:You Got the Love

You've Got The Love was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 25 November 2009 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into You Got the Love. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Electronic music Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Florence & The Machine Version - MTV Ad

Could someone add the cover that Florence & The Machine has done. An up & coming indie act, the song has come to prominence of late because of the MTV 'M Stands for Music' ad in December '08. I'm hopeless at writing articles! Connor oc (talk) 15:23, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Florence and the what now?

Does this article really need so much coverage of a minor cover version by a relatively unknown artist? If it'd been a massive smash hit then maybe it'd justify having so much detail, but the fact that there are twice as many paragraphs (using paragraphs as a rough method of approximating amount of content) about the #59 hit than the #3 original seems somewhat... unbalanced? -- Bobyllib (talk) 01:47, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Florence and the Machine is currenrly one of the best selling artists of 2009 in the UK, her album 'Lungs' would have gotten 5 weeks at number one in the UK album chart had Michael Jackson not died. Which is amazing for any new artist. This single made it to #59 chart via word of mouth alone, and is now being released as a single. If anything this cover version needs it's own article. Freshpop (talk) 02:34, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How could you not have heard of Florence and the Machine? They are really popular in the UK! You would only have to have watched the Brit Awards to know that. --92.237.115.175 (talk) 14:49, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Forence + the Machine Cover page split

Can I suggest that the 'Forence + the Machine Cover' section gets moved to You've Got the Love? With a note at the top of the page saying about the orginal version. Thanks, Freshpop (talk) 02:41, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, it should be. --86.44.204.43 (talk) 01:41, 25 October 2009 (UTC)/ --Kei_Jo (aka Keithf2008) (Talk to me, baby! :P) 01:42, 25 October 2009 (UTC) (I forgot to sign in)[reply]

Third vote here. I love both versions but smushing both of them together on the one page does neither any favours - F&tM end up crowding out the original whilst looking like interloping victims of misplaced fanwank. Pop the full blurb on its own page with a little footnote and a link on Source/Staton's... 77.102.101.220 (talk) 21:54, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cover versions shouldn't be given separate articles. This discussion comes up all the time but consensus is always that all versions of the same song should be covered in the same article. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 00:54, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dirtee Love

Can't we make a separate article for this? As a mash-up, it's a different song. Why have the same info both here and at "Dirtee Cash" article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.92.39.47 (talk) 13:22, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on You Got the Love. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:31, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on You Got the Love. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141006100124/http://www.fimi.it/archivio_certificazioni.php to http://www.fimi.it/archivio_certificazioni.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:46, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]