Talk:You Don't Miss Your Water

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

R&B and Soul Music

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Australia: Western Australia / Music Low‑importance

	Australia portal You Don't Miss Your Water is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian music (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Western Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong

Triffids version is excessive without rationale

Why is this section so detailed? Neither Bell’s version sees such treatment re: details, nor does the Triffid’s own page devote much more than a single line. I don’t mind this as I believe more info is better contrary to several Wikipedia policies. Regardless, if some reasoning were added here why the Triffid’s version deserves the exposure, then I can see that being helpful to understand why the detail lends an air of importance that is otherwise not supported currently. WPGuin (talk) 04:17, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I kind of agree. I think the text about the Triffids' version should be trimmed down and incorporated into the preceeding "Cover versions" sub-section. Lose the Infobox and release track listing too, as I don't see that it's notable enough to warrant those. --Kohoutek1138 (talk) 17:52, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]