Jump to content

Talk:You're Not Sorry/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: ..:CK:.. (talk2me) 23:41, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Starting the review. ..:CK:.. (talk2me) 23:41, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • "It enjoyed positive commercial outcomes in North America" should be rewritten. Doesn't quite flow. I would use "Achieved". Done
  • "In the United States, "You're Not Sorry" also at number eleven on the Billboard Hot 100 and[...]" Needs to be rewritten. Done
  • Link number 7 should not be linked to a url, see 4 Minutes to see how it should be linked. Done
  • In the article it says the song has been certified Gold, it needs a certification section and a proper link.. this is the link needed : link The one currently used doesn't link to the actual certification. Done
  • If possible, there should be a "Personal Section". Never mind, not all GA's contain this.
  • "Swift wrote "You're Not Sorry", inspired by an ex-boyfriend who was revealed to be who she thought he was." Needs to be rewritten, doesnt flow or sound correct. Done
  • "She wrote "You're Not Sorry" an an emotional state,[...]" double an, i think you meant "in an emotional state[...]" Done
  • "The circumstances faced a point[...]" I think you mean... "The circumstances reached a point[...]" Done
  • Under chart performance, there are two back to back sentences starting with "The song was[...]" (last and second last sentences to be specific). I would reword the last sentence to say : In Canada, the song debuted and peaked at number eleven on the Canadian Hot 100. Something like that, just so they dont start with the same opening statement.  Done
  • The main image is 300x302. Images should not be any bigger then 300x300. Its needs a new upload. Done
  • "You're Not Sorry" spent a total of five weeks on the Billboard Hot 100. "You're Not Sorry" also peaked at number twenty-one the now-defunct Pop 100 Chart". Back to back opening again. Done

Please correct these, i will add more(if found) and begin the prose review once these issues are addressed. ..:CK:.. (talk2me) 23:41, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Prose Review:

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    Good range and well formatted.
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    Almost spot on. Except ref 21 should be italicized "Miami New Times" is a newspaper.
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    I believe this article passes :) Nice work. ..:CK:.. (talk2me) 07:57, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]