Talk:You're Not Sorry/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: ..:CK:.. (talk2me) 23:41, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
Starting the review. ..:CK:.. (talk2me) 23:41, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
- "It enjoyed positive commercial outcomes in North America" should be rewritten. Doesn't quite flow. I would use "Achieved".
Done
- "In the United States, "You're Not Sorry" also at number eleven on the Billboard Hot 100 and[...]" Needs to be rewritten.
Done
- Link number 7 should not be linked to a url, see 4 Minutes to see how it should be linked.
Done
- In the article it says the song has been certified Gold, it needs a certification section and a proper link.. this is the link needed : link The one currently used doesn't link to the actual certification.
Done
If possible, there should be a "Personal Section".Never mind, not all GA's contain this.- "Swift wrote "You're Not Sorry", inspired by an ex-boyfriend who was revealed to be who she thought he was." Needs to be rewritten, doesnt flow or sound correct.
Done
- "She wrote "You're Not Sorry" an an emotional state,[...]" double an, i think you meant "in an emotional state[...]"
Done
- "The circumstances faced a point[...]" I think you mean... "The circumstances reached a point[...]"
Done
- Under chart performance, there are two back to back sentences starting with "The song was[...]" (last and second last sentences to be specific). I would reword the last sentence to say : In Canada, the song debuted and peaked at number eleven on the Canadian Hot 100. Something like that, just so they dont start with the same opening statement.
Done
- The main image is 300x302. Images should not be any bigger then 300x300. Its needs a new upload.
Done
- "You're Not Sorry" spent a total of five weeks on the Billboard Hot 100. "You're Not Sorry" also peaked at number twenty-one the now-defunct Pop 100 Chart". Back to back opening again.
Done
Please correct these, i will add more(if found) and begin the prose review once these issues are addressed. ..:CK:.. (talk2me) 23:41, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
Prose Review:
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- Good range and well formatted.
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- Almost spot on. Except ref 21 should be italicized "Miami New Times" is a newspaper.
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- I believe this article passes :) Nice work. ..:CK:.. (talk2me) 07:57, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail: