Talk:You and I (Lady Gaga song)/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Calvin • ⁹⁹⁹ 13:49, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it well written?

   A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

   B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

2. Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?

   A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

   B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

   C. It contains no original research:

   D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

   B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

4. Is it neutral?

   It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

5. Is it stable?

   It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:

6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

• Lead info

1. "Written by Gaga and produced by her and Robert John "Mutt" Lange" → "Written by Gaga and co-produced with Robert John "Mutt" Lange". I don't think "by her" is reads well.
2. "and positive" → "a positive".
3. "then-boyfriend" → You have used "former boyfriend" in the Background section which is better.
4. "Gaga and Lange giving background vocals." → "providing background..."
5. "due to digital downloads" → "due to strong digital download sales"

• Background

1. "and positive" → "a positive".
2. The paragraph quote has an end quotation mark, but not a start quotation mark. You could use this to improve the aesthetic:

“ ... ”

• Reception

1. "the Billboard Hot 100" → "the US..."

• Live performances

1. It may be worth just mentioning that the first time the song was performed, although it wasn't a live performance, was at Elton John's party.

• Cover versions

1. Did Hayley's version chart on the Hot 100?

• Nope, it didn't. Reached 75 on Hot Digital songs. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 14:28, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

• General Points

1. 2 erroneous links

Great article, very informative, I enjoyed reading it as there is hardly anything to ammend, tell me when you've done them and I'll pass it :) Calvin • ⁹⁹⁹ 12:34, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Done all, that erroneous link was actually a redirect and another I had to add a website archive. Thanks. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 14:28, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Passed :) Calvin • ⁹⁹⁹ 14:54, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks so much, Legolas and Calvin! --Another Believer _(Talk) 15:15, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.