Talk:Yelena Mizulina

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Russia

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Conservatism

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Russian Wikipedia#Blackout|Russian-language Wikipedia protest]] The anchor (#Blackout) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Untitled

This is a practically verbatim translation of the Russian page on Yelena Mizulina.

Yes, and this is terrible. "По сообщениям прессы, фонд принадлежит Елене Мизулиной". This is English wikipedia. Fix it. My very best wishes (talk) 22:52, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I did a thorough reading of this article and checked some of the sources and general accuracy, which seems suitable. I cut some remarks that sound pointless. I reverted BLP: more than enough references are provided including numerous ones to Russian newspaper and official websites (political parties, etc). An effort has been made by some contributors following previous remarks to include some sources in english language. I reverted cleanup: proofreading now seems ok and most links have been fixed. I also reverted the undue weight as the neutrality concern seems sufficient and most of the text appears to deal with actual sourced facts, irrespective of the tone used. Zatelmae (talk) 19:13, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Watch with an eye to protection

The POV-pushing and editing is coming close to a war. Can people please watch this closely? Is this nonsense continues, we may have to take this case to WP:RFPP for semi- or full protection. Bearian (talk) 14:50, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It has been in my watchlist for some time already.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:34, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Bearian (talk) 17:33, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Homosexual agenda - Propaganda of homosexuality

Please explain the reasons for these reverts: [1][2]. If the issue is the link, then I don't think it's correct - the so-called 'homosexual agenda' is a term for an American concept, and the link is an "Easter egg link". If the issue is whether "propaganda of homosexuality" makes sense in plain English, I proposed "promotion of homosexuality", which I think captures the essence nicely. 2602:306:C5B4:E3D0:F05D:49AD:7B3C:978C (talk) 11:03, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To me, propaganda of homosexuality does not make sense, since one only make propaganda of smth that could be changed/amended/adopted. However, Russian lawmakers think differently. In their view, one person can "convince" another person to become homosexual, and there is propaganda of homosexuality which is aimed at more people "adopting" homosexuality. This is why they passed a law criminalizing such "propaganda". This is to a some extent explained in the article LGBT rights in Russia. Therefore just saying "propaganda of homosexuality" without a link or with a link to homosexuality does not really capture the concept. This is a loaded language which only make sense in the context of the recent Russian law. I am open to how it could be worded, but I think the current version is way better that what you propose.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:17, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to say, by using a link, that "propaganda of homosexuality" and "homosexual agenda" agenda are the same thing, then you, or someone, needs to edit the homosexual agenda article to indicate that it's also a Russian concept. (See here for my complete remark, which I was disallowed from saving on this page. [3] 2602:306:C5B4:E3D0:F05D:49AD:7B3C:978C (talk) 11:30, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, they are not the same, but at least "homosexual agenda" is smth close to the Russian law, whereas the "propaganda of homosexuality" without a proper link is not.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:38, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Then go over and say so on the "agenda" article. Have you read it? It says repeatedly that it's an American term. Another option would be to add some text here explaining "propaganda of homosexuality" instead of the easter egg link. Is there any source connecting them? If not then we shouldn't be doing so either. How about linking to Russian LGBT propaganda law, if a link is needed? 2602:306:C5B4:E3D0:F05D:49AD:7B3C:978C (talk) 11:44, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That would be ok with me.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:48, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure which you're referring to, but go ahead. 2602:306:C5B4:E3D0:F05D:49AD:7B3C:978C (talk) 11:52, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I did it slightly differently, pls have a look.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:55, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's perfect. I wish I'd done that in the first pace. Thanks. 2602:306:C5B4:E3D0:F05D:49AD:7B3C:978C (talk) 11:59, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]