Talk:Yehuecauhceratops

Dinosaurs Low‑importance

	Dinosaurs portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[ceratopsia#anatomy|epiossifications]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Images

Hello, recently while looking for images of this new dinosaur among the media pages, I found a very good images of fossil replicas in the museum, and it turns out that in the bottom says that they are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. [1] Would it be nice to add a few pictures? User:FunkMonk Levi bernardo (talk) 23:50, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The images look nice, though I am unsure about accuracy given the mount is heavily restored. In particular, I don't really see the rugose projection on the parietal ridge. Lythronaxargestes (talk) 02:12, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

True, I said the same thing when I saw the images of the mold. But I can contact the sculptor and the author of the publication about why you do not see the rugose projection on the parietal ridge, and other details. It is a rare thing since in the publication it is one of the bones that more deals in the text. Levi bernardo (talk) 19:40, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]