Talk:Yehudi lights/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 15:35, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Will take this one. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 15:35, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Many thanks. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:45, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

• Lead and infobox;
  • Yehudi lights have again attracted interest; again in the sense, at present, also this is never discussed in the body.

See the whole paragraph in "Later developments", except the first sentence.

• Section 1 & 2; All good

Thanks.

• Section 3;
  • director of technical services; use capitals for initialization; Director of Technical Services

Done.

• • What is the necessity of quote? Merge it with general prose

Done.

• • Link "US Army Air Force"

Done.

• • Abbreviate units from the second mention

I think we should either abbreviate all of them or none; I prefer the words.

• • used lforward-pointing lamps; "lforward"?

Fixed.

• Section 4; all good

Thanks.

• File:PBY Catalina landing.jpg doesn't have appropriate summary

Extended summary on Commons.

• One dead link identified

Added archive link.

• 1% confidence, violation unlikely, well done.

Good work, Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 07:08, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Many thanks for the review. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:29, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

---

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 10:47, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Many thanks for the review. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:36, 2 February 2017 (UTC)