Jump to content

Talk:Yehudi lights/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 15:35, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Will take this one. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 15:35, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:45, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Lead and infobox;
    • Yehudi lights have again attracted interest; again in the sense, at present, also this is never discussed in the body.
See the whole paragraph in "Later developments", except the first sentence.
  • Section 1 & 2; All good
Thanks.
  • Section 3;
    • director of technical services; use capitals for initialization; Director of Technical Services
Done.
    • What is the necessity of quote? Merge it with general prose
Done.
    • Link "US Army Air Force"
Done.
    • Abbreviate units from the second mention
I think we should either abbreviate all of them or none; I prefer the words.
    • used lforward-pointing lamps; "lforward"?
Fixed.
  • Section 4; all good
Thanks.
  • File:PBY Catalina landing.jpg doesn't have appropriate summary
Extended summary on Commons.
Added archive link.
Good work, Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 07:08, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks for the review. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:29, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 10:47, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks for the review. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:36, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]